DISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON THE IMPACT ON VACCINE HESITANCY IN OLDER ADULTS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17564/2316-3798.2026v10n2p123-138

Authors

  • Maria Eduarda da Silva Cunha
  • Maria Nataniele Queiroz de Lima
  • Maria Emanuele da Silva Marcos
  • Joabe Braz Lima
  • Diego Silva Milhome
  • Larissa Nicolete unilab

Published

2026-04-25

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

A study conducted in the Maciço do Baturité region, Ceará, Brazil, explored how misinformation influences vaccine hesitancy among individuals over 60 years old. The research involved 202 elderly participants from health units in the cities of Redenção and Acarape, where data were collected through face-to-face questionnaires. Statistical analyses were used to examine factors related to belief in fake news and reluctance to vaccinate. Findings revealed that 145 participants, or 71.8%, reported exposure to fake news, yet this was not statistically significantly associated with their views on vaccination (p=0.104). Women reported higher exposure to misinformation (p=0.079), suggesting a notable trend. Conversely, individuals with greater religious participation showed stronger confidence in COVID-19 vaccines (p=0.006), highlighting a significant difference. Interestingly, education level did not significantly affect vaccine confidence (p=0.388). Although no direct, significant link was found between fake news and vaccine resistance, the study underscores that factors such as gender and religiosity shape how the elderly perceive misinformation and trust vaccines. This emphasizes the need for communication strategies tailored to cultural, religious, and socioeconomic differences to enhance vaccine uptake among this population.

How to Cite

da Silva Cunha, M. E., Queiroz de Lima, M. N., da Silva Marcos, M. E., Braz Lima, J., Silva Milhome, D., & Nicolete, L. (2026). DISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON THE IMPACT ON VACCINE HESITANCY IN OLDER ADULTS. Interfaces Científicas - Saúde E Ambiente, 10(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.17564/2316-3798.2026v10n2p123-138